[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email
- From: Henne Vogelsang <hvogel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:31:30 +0200
- To: Kai Hendry <hendry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: mlmmj@xxxxxxxxx
Hey, On 25.07.2013 14:04, Kai Hendry wrote: > On 25 July 2013 19:55, Henne Vogelsang <hvogel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> There are a lot of things that can be multipart/alternative and >> multipart/related in a mail. And especially people with very broken >> client setups tend to not send mime-formatted text. It has proven to be >> not very reliable for us... > > On my testing Gmail as a MUA sends emails with patches for example > with multipart/mixed. Same goes for mutt MUA. > multipart/alternative for HTML in gmail > multipart/related when using emojii in gmail We serve over 130 lists with over 32K subscribers and around 2K mails a day. I guess there are nearly as many MUA/MTA/Config combinations ;-) If you run a small amount of list with a specific set of people subscribed filtering on multipart/* can work. It all depends on your subscribers... Henne -- Henne Vogelsang http://www.opensuse.org Everybody has a plan, until they get hit. - Mike Tyson
Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email | Ben Schmidt <mail_ben_schmidt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
[mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email | Kai Hendry <hendry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email | Marc MAURICE <marc-mlmmj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email | Florian Effenberger <floeff@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email | Kai Hendry <hendry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email | Henne Vogelsang <hvogel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email | Kai Hendry <hendry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |