Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email
- Subject: Re: [mlmmj] Rejecting HTML email
- From: Henne Vogelsang <hvogel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:31:30 +0200
- To: Kai Hendry <hendry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: mlmmj@xxxxxxxxx
On 25.07.2013 14:04, Kai Hendry wrote:
> On 25 July 2013 19:55, Henne Vogelsang <hvogel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> There are a lot of things that can be multipart/alternative and
>> multipart/related in a mail. And especially people with very broken
>> client setups tend to not send mime-formatted text. It has proven to be
>> not very reliable for us...
> On my testing Gmail as a MUA sends emails with patches for example
> with multipart/mixed. Same goes for mutt MUA.
> multipart/alternative for HTML in gmail
> multipart/related when using emojii in gmail
We serve over 130 lists with over 32K subscribers and around 2K mails a
day. I guess there are nearly as many MUA/MTA/Config combinations ;-)
If you run a small amount of list with a specific set of people
subscribed filtering on multipart/* can work. It all depends on your
Everybody has a plan, until they get hit.
- Mike Tyson